Nomads on the Amstel
43. Revelations on TV

Vandenbroek on Friday

Extract from transcript of programme broadcast,
Friday, September, 8th, 21:30

Paul Vandenbroek: - Tonight we are pleased to welcome Amsterdam’s Chief of Police, Hans Meijer, who’s joined by the Emergency Response Coordinator for the city, Rick van Rooien; Jan Theunissen, editor of De Roze Gazette and spokesperson for several gay groups and finally Lidy Jacobs, director of Victim Support, Amsterdam. Welcome to you all.
The subject of discussion this evening is, of course the terrible tragedy of just over a week ago; why did it happen, are there any lessons to be learned and what do we do in the long term to make sure it never happens again?
Mr van Rooien, if I may come to you first; it’s now a week after the event and we are still only guessing how the fire started, or why. For some reason, there seems to be some sort of news restriction in operation. Surely the authorities have come up with some answers by now. Can you throw some light on the matter?

Rick van Rooien: - As I’m sure you’re aware Mr Vandenbroek, a disaster of this nature is very complex and it is very important that we have all the facts to hand before coming to conclusions. Our investigators are working twenty four hours a day, sifting through the rubble, searching for clues. At this point in time, I can only say that the investigation is ongoing and very thorough but there is little point to be gained by releasing unverified and partial information.

PV: - With all due respect, that seems to me to be the standard official response at the moment but it tells us nothing. Why it not possible to ask a senior official such as yourself, for some relevant and direct answers to relevant and direct questions?

RvR: - I don’t recall you asking me a direct question Mr. Vandenbroek. You asked several questions to which there can only be a general answer.

PV: - Okay then, as Emergency Response Coordinator, you must surely know why so many people died and whether tragedy on such a large scale could have been prevented? Did the emergency services respond as quickly as they should have for instance?

RvR: - It strikes me as obvious why so many people died Mr. Vandenbroek; if you have a large number of people in a confined space and fire breaks out then there are bound to be high casualties. As to whether it could have been prevented, our investigations are still ongoing as I said before.

PV: - As you are clearly not prepared to give us details, we can assume two things can we not; one, that you don’t know the answers yourself and two, that you’re being told not to give anything away! Am I getting close here?

RvR: - There’s no hidden agenda here but in answer to your question; yes and no Mr. Vandenbroek. Yes it’s true, I don’t know the full details yet; as I’ve repeatedly said, the investigation is still underway and no, I am not being muzzled as you seem to suggest!

PV: - You did say two interesting things which might help to bring light on the matter. One that it was a confined space and two that the casualties were high. You can surely appreciate that many of our viewers are completely in the dark about the whole affair? Now, it may seem that these two facts are obvious but officially even these are not admitted. We have no idea of the conditions at the time of the fire in that Darkroom and we have no definite casualty figures. How is it possible that we have to depend on second-hand reports and calculated guesswork as to how many died? What’s the big secret here Mr. van Rooien? Why do we all get the distinct impression that somebody or some organisation has something to hide?

RvR: - That’s your opinion Mr. Vandenbroek. I can only speak from my position and for the people who are working tirelessly and I might add, often thanklessly, to establish all the facts, based on solid evidence. That takes time. We would appreciate being given the time by the media to do our job properly.

PV: - Mr. Meijer, as chief of police, you’ve been quoted in much the same way as Mr. van Rooien; giving very little away. I suppose it’s reasonable to expect that the same will apply here so I’ll ask a hypothetical question. Let us suppose that eventually an individual, or individuals, or an organisation will have to take responsibility for what’s happened. If we take Volendam or Enschede as examples, there will undoubtedly be civil court actions and law suits but I’m curious what the current attitude of the police might be. Who would the police prosecute in the event of negligence? Let’s say again hypothetically, that a bar or club owner is responsible for safety precautions. That would make him or her directly responsible for any shortcomings leading to personal injury wouldn’t it? I think that’s perfectly logical but what if the regulations themselves fall short of what is necessary to ensure public safety?

Hans Meijer: - I’m not sure what you’re getting at Mr. Vandenbroek.

PV: - Well, let’s say, for the sake of argument, that the authorities who issue safety licences are the ones who lay down the rules for what is safe and what is not. If the owner follows the regulations to the letter but the regulations themselves are flawed, who is culpable then?

HM: - I think that’s probably a question of interpretation and one for the lawyers but in principle, I suppose the ultimate responsibility lies with those who establish the rules.

PV: - I see but isn’t it true that the issuers of safety licences for bars, restaurants and clubs in Amsterdam, are the police themselves?

HM: - That’s true but…

PV: - Therefore you agree that the police may have to shoulder some of the responsibility for what has happened here?

HM: - No, I didn’t say that. It hasn’t been proved that the safety rules are deficient in any way.

PV: - So there’s some doubt?

HM: - Please don’t put words into my mouth Mr. Vandenbroek. As has been clearly stated already, investigations are still underway. As yet, no one individual or organisation has been implicated, or accused of malpractice.

PV: - Should the Darkrooms be closed down Mr. Meijer?

HM: - Uhm…that’s really not a question for me to answer. That sort of decision is taken at council level.

PV: - But the police have the power to close down premises that constitute a public hazard don’t they?

HM: - It first has to be established that it is a public hazard.

PV: - I think that the many people who died last week would probably testify to that don’t you? Okay, not in your professional capacity but from a personal point of view; a moral point of view, do you think the Darkrooms should be closed down?

HM: - Personally? Yes… I do.

PV: - Thank you Mr. Meijer and now we turn to Jan Theunissen, who I’m fairly sure has strong views on this subject. Mr. Theunissen, as editor of De Roze Gazette, you’re already on record as having advocated closure of the Darkrooms and saunas in the past. In the light of what has happened, do you still stand by those views?

Jan Theunissen: - You’re referring to an editorial from several years ago, when the Aids epidemic was at its peak and even then I only suggested that the darkrooms and saunas be closed temporarily in order to study the effects thereof. It was also a time before the gay business associations got their act together and actively promoted safe sex on their premises.

PV: - …and now?

JT: - In principal, I support the right of every individual to make his or her own choices. There is no excuse for ignorance in Amsterdam. If people want to meet each other in saunas or darkrooms, then with all the knowledge and resources for disease prevention that are now available, they should be able to do so.

PV: - Yes but we’re not talking about the effects of an epidemic of STDs here. Given the terrible events of a week ago, would you close them down now?

JT: - No but let me qualify that by saying this: - what happened a week ago didn’t happen because gay men were gathered together in one place; it happened because that place was a fire hazard and a disaster waiting to happen. That has nothing to do with the moral implications of what gay men do with each other but everything to do with human greed and selfishness and the seemingly insatiable need for exploitation and personal gain.

PV: - So you place the blame firmly on the owner of the bar?

JT: - No, I place the blame on plenty of other people apart from him. Amsterdam’s gay businessmen, bar owners and the like, whose greed is boundless; the police and fire services who ran around like headless chickens while people were dying agonizing deaths; the council, who have no idea what goes on in their own city, or if they do, turn a blind eye for the sake of commerce. No, the bar owner is merely the tip of a particularly nasty iceberg.

PV: - One moment Mr. Theunissen; before you go any further; you seem to be making several serious accusations here. You’re saying that your own people are at fault?

JT: - What do you mean, ‘your own people’! They’re not my people; they’re just people and there are bad apples in all of life’s barrels. Do you honestly think that I believe just because people are gay, they can’t be wrong, or criminals? That strikes me as a naïve comment at best and discriminatory at worst.
Let me put it this way: for years now, tourist numbers to Amsterdam have been dropping and by tourists, for the sake of clarity, I mean gay tourists. I’m sure it is no surprise that Amsterdam could once rightly claim to be the gay capital of Europe, perhaps even the world! But that no longer applies and do you know why? I’ll tell you why. Gay Amsterdam’s business community sat back on their collective fat arses and let the money roll in, whilst doing absolutely nothing to improve facilities or update premises. They saw themselves; see themselves even, as part of quaint old Amsterdam, with all its charm and tolerance and freedoms; part of the general tourist picture. They were the flip-side of the tourist coin along with the red Light District; see the Rijksmuseum by day and be naughty at night! What they failed to notice was that other European cities were also becoming more tolerant and gay life was being officially allowed to flourish. Everyone now knows the strength of the pink dollar. So right under their noses, London, Manchester, Madrid, Barcelona, Berlin, Munich, Cologne, to name but a few became decidedly more attractive and what’s more important, decidedly cheaper. So now, commercial gay Amsterdam is faced with falling visitor numbers and is bleating that not enough money’s coming in to bring it all up to date. As a consequence, prices are going up, facilities are being left to rot and the events of last week are clear evidence of the effects of years of neglect. Apart from that, we all know how prices have been forced up by the introduction of the Euro; well my own people as you put it, are in the forefront of ripping off their own people! You try buying a beer in a gay bar for under €2.50 after ten o clock at night and then they wonder why the customers are staying away in droves!

PV: - Well, I must say, that’s pretty strong stuff Mr. Theunissen but you hinted that the emergency services and the council itself must also share the blame. Can you explain what you mean?

JT: - I certainly can. Let’s say, for the sake of argument that a hundred people have been burned to death and by the way, I share your disbelief that we don’t yet know exactly how many. What on earth is going on here? People have a right to know the facts and you can’t tell me that there aren’t facts to know! For some inexplicable reason, the authorities are covering up. Why? What purpose can it serve to hide the truth?
From what I’ve heard and my sources are readers themselves who’ve lost people, there are at least sixty dead and many more missing! I’ll leave it to you people to ferret out the exact figures. What I find more disturbing is that it was fully ten minutes before the police arrived on the scene and twenty five minutes before the first fire engine was in place in front of the building. Now assuming the police came from the Nieuwezijds Voorburgwal, you can practically spit into the Anvil from there. The fire engines probably came from the Marnixstraat and how far away is that for God’s sake! For sure, the alarm was raised the minute someone saw the first smoke so why the delay? How many people died unnecessarily because the emergency services were so slow in responding?

PV: - That seems a fair question to put to Rick van Rooien. Mr. van Rooien how do you react to that?

RvR: - I don’t react, that’s how! I find it beneath contempt that Mr. Theunissen can cast a slur on the valiant and brave efforts of the firemen and women that night. Has he forgotten that one man died and two others are seriously injured?

JT: - Wasn’t that because the fire was already an inferno when they finally arrived? Of course, I’ve got nothing but praise for the individual efforts of those brave people; they did their very best in incredibly difficult circumstances. My question is why it took so long for the whole operation to get into gear; can you answer that one?

RvR: - Have you any idea how busy it is in Amsterdam on a weekend evening in the summer? Have you any idea how many people are wandering around; how many terraces are full and overflowing into areas they shouldn’t? The streets are too narrow for the big engines; there are bikes and cars parked illegally everywhere and what’s worst, some people see it as fun to deliberately get in the way, or climb on the engines, or even lie down in the street. It’s a nightmare!

PV: - So you’re saying in effect that the police should clear the way first? Doesn’t that require good coordination?

RvR: - It requires excellent coordination and most of the time we have exactly that.

JT: - So what went wrong this time then! You’ve virtually admitted that the whole operation was incompetently handled. Let’s hope the families of the victims are understanding of your problems!

RvR: - As I’ve repeatedly stated, investigations are still on-going. Until they’re complete I can’t draw any firm conclusions but one thing is sure, I’m not going to make a rushed statement just because you want me to, or because it’ll make the headlines tomorrow.

Hans Meijer: - And before you start again, that goes for me too!

PV: - Well ladies and gentleman, it’s clear that a one hour programme is not going to be able to discuss all the implications of the disaster. It’s also obvious that we’ve just scratched the surface of what appears to be an extremely complex issue. In the time we’ve got left, let me finally turn to Lidy Jacobs, director of Victim Support, Amsterdam: apologies for keeping you waiting Miss Jacobs. You’ve had close contact with many of the victims’ families haven’t you? Can you give us an idea of how they’re feeling, given that they’ve been told so little?

Lidy Jacobs: - I don’t think that question even deserves an answer! How do you think they’re feeling Mr. Vandenbroek? They’re grieving but they’re angry and they’re frustrated. There is no possibility of closure for these families until their loved ones are buried and they have a satisfactory answer as to how and why they died. The only people making a real effort to give them effective and immediate support are the gay community themselves. Jan Theunissen is too modest to say it himself but thanks to him and other prominent gay people, the families are being given the opportunity for counselling and advice. It’s a very difficult job and some people don’t want help in what is at best a sensitive area. We in Victim Support are also doing our best but so many people in the health care services seem to be paralyzed by the enormity of the tragedy and don’t seem to know what to do. It’s a sad irony but one positive side effect of the Aids epidemic is that the gay groups are very experienced when it comes to handling the consequences of death. I don’t know what we’d do without them. However, like everyone else, we also need some answers. We can’t do our job properly unless we’re given contact lists, names, addresses and the like. We depend on outside information and can’t understand why, in this case, it’s so difficult to find. I spoke to a family just yesterday who knew for sure that they’re son was in the bar that night. He’s now missing and naturally, they’re assuming the worst. The police have refused to tell them if his name is on the list of fatalities but told them to assume nothing. It was even insensitively suggested that he’d taken the opportunity to ‘disappear’, which apparently occasionally happens in cases like this. With apparently no way of finding out officially if his body has been found or not, they’ve contacted every hospital in the city, in the faint hope that he’s amongst the injured. Again, they’ve met a wall of silence. Every hospital has said that, as far as they’re concerned, his name is not known to them but that’s not to say that he wasn’t, at some stage, admitted or treated! What in heaven’s name does that mean? Why is nobody giving out definite information? Is this just mass inefficiency or is there something else going on? No wonder everybody’s talking about the latest, stupid conspiracy theories; it’s a perfect breeding ground for them.

PV: - I’m afraid I have to stop you there as we’re running out of time. More questions than answers then! Hopefully, all those involved in the aftermath of this terrible tragedy will learn the lessons that are clearly there to be learned. I’d like to thank our guests this evening and of course…

Jan Theunissen: - I have just one more thing to say Mr. Vandenbroek? It’s a question, for Hans Meijer and Rick van Rooien actually but don’t worry, I don’t expect an answer!

PV: - Well, uh…I suppose so but you have less thirty seconds I’m afraid.

JT: - That’s quite long enough. Can you gentlemen verify or deny something I’ve heard from a very reliable source?
Is it true that the reason there’s a news blackout over this whole affair is that two very prominent people lie regretfully amongst the dead?
Is it true that the corpses of a cabinet minister’s son and a member of our own royal family were found linked together in the ashes?
44. A city mourns

They began arriving just after the sun slid its first, cleansing rays through the mazes of the Red Light district and piled-up detritus in the Chinese quarter. It was one of those summer mornings where the warmth of the previous evening still hung in the air but was moistened by a palpable dew, as if the city perspired from the exertions of the night. Brushing off yet more pestering, insomniac junkies, a few surviving English revellers who had never made it back to their hotels, blinked in astonishment as the scene slowly unfolded before them. The pilot of a traffic helicopter, lazily circling above the centre while waiting for the onset of the Saturday traffic, reached for his camera to record what he saw.

Still only half awake and with a headache from the torments of the night, John pulled on his dressing gown and wandered into the living room, following the enticing coffee aroma that drifted through the flat. He smiled as he saw his larger than life friend busy at the kitchen sink. Guus had arrived the evening before and had slept uncomfortably on the settee. The women had gone to bed early in preparation for the early start of the next morning and the two men had sat and talked for the first time in quite a while, as well as finishing off two bottles of wine left over from the meal. John had needed it. He had needed to talk to Guus, who viewed things from a different perspective and whose ideas weren’t tinged with gay bias. It had done him good though had solved nothing. Guus didn’t really understand how John felt about Marcel and couldn’t remember what it felt like in the first stages of infatuation but he intuitively understood the effects of the trauma and gave him the male support he subconsciously craved. Tinnie and Amália had offered him a haven, a nest where he could lick his wounds in peace but although they wrapped his emotions in cotton wool, they didn’t instinctively understand the assault of the last few weeks on his masculinity the way Guus did.
“You’re up then? Coffee? You look as though you need it. There are croissants, ham, cheese and a few other things I found in the fridge. Shall I wake the ladies?”
“Oh, give them a few minutes more eh! I need to wake up in peace before Tinnie starts bullying me into getting dressed. This is great Guus, have you been up long?”
“Nah, but I couldn’t go back to sleep; that settee’s not made for my bulk I’m afraid; it creaked all night long in protest. I thought I’d make myself useful. Hope they don’t mind me taking over their kitchen.”
John looked up and roared with laughter. Guus was standing arms akimbo by the breakfast bar. He was wearing one of Amália’s voluminous night gowns, bedecked in huge red peonies; his hair stuck out in all directions and some bright red jam stuck to the corner of his mouth.
“Have I said something funny?”
“No no, but have you looked in a mirror this morning? God I needed that. I haven’t laughed like that for so long it seems. I can feel the relief tingling through my whole body. Guus, you’re better than pills any day!”
Guus put the coffee down on the table and sat next to his friend.
“Are you ready for today? Can you handle it? You only have to say the word and we can get the hell out of there if you want.”
“I don’t know I really don’t. I have no idea what’s going to happen, or how big a thing it’s going to be. It’s not as if it’s a funeral or a memorial service or anything is it? It’s just a sort of…well, I’m not sure really. I think it’s important that I go though and Tinnie and Amália really want to do it. It’s about time I gave them a bit of support instead of the other way round.”
“Talking about us behind our backs are we!”
Tinnie burst into the room closely followed by Amália looking every bit her age and rubbing her eyes.
“My god, Guus, you’re an angel! And may I say, you look like an angel too! Breakfast! What a luxury! Okay guys, I’ve laid out as much white as I can find on the bed, plus what Guus kindly brought. You’ll have to make it up as you go along. We’ve got one hour precisely, then we must all be dressed and showered and out of here. We don’t want to miss the beginning.”
John and Guus looked at each other, grinned and shrugged. In this sort of mood, Tinnie was not to be argued with.

First a trickle and then little by little, streams of people were snaking their way along the canals and as yet unpolluted main roads towards the Dam. From above, it seemed like a firework, slowly imploding on itself. The water sparkled blindingly, flanked by the hazy, dusty green of the late summer trees but the abiding impression was of ribbons of white converging on the square. Gay organisations had half-heartedly suggested that everybody try to wear white as a unifying element to the gathering but the people had taken it to heart. Most people had seen moving pictures of a ‘white’ march a few years earlier in Belgium and although the reasons were greatly different, the effect was the same. White had the power to neutralise pain and was a symbol of purity and peace; a contradiction and rejection of the fury of the fire and although a few multicoloured and rainbow elements stood out here and there, the predominate colour was white.

‘In a land where demonstration and protest are accepted forms of democratic choice until they get out of hand that is, what you see happening behind me is unusual even for Amsterdam. Thousands of people have taken to the streets as a tribute to the dead in the tragic fire of last week but also to demonstrate their displeasure with both local government and the police and the emergency services administrators. We were here to cover an entirely different story but the extent and power of this march are clearly of some significance. Maybe the pictures on your screen don’t convey it very well but I can assure you that the atmosphere is dignified, restrained and respectful yet powerfully charged with emotion. It has taken everybody by surprise; organisers, police and local shops who were expecting to open up for a normal Saturday’s business. That they have all now voluntarily closed their doors bears witness to the strength of feeling engendered by this unique event. The gathering in the Dam Square was planned of course but it was expected to be a mainly gay event with only several hundred in attendance. What is happening here represents a spontaneous expression of public feeling. It’s the Princess Diana effect all over again. It has taken on a life of its own and we will be here the whole day to report on events as they happen.
This is Görtz Heinrich reporting for ZDF in Amsterdam and now back to the studio for a summary of the rest of today’s news.’

Within a couple of hours, the square was filling up; first tens and then hundreds and eventually thousands of men, women and children making the streets impassable for traffic. Looking on askance, the riot police babbled on their walkie-talkies, asking their superiors for advice. White shirts, trousers, skirts, coats, even sheets draped toga-like around shoulders. Balloons, banners, flags and streamers drifted along the lines of slowly moving people and the city slowly ground to a halt.

Picking disconsolately at the oily omelette on his plate, Arjan glanced up at the TV perched above the bar. Outside, the traffic hooted and honked and belched fumes into the air. The café filled up with workers from the local engineering factory and the smoke from their pungent cigarettes quickly gave the air an ochre tint. It was noisy and boisterous and nobody paid attention to the CNN pictures from Amsterdam. The constant babble echoed meaninglessly around his head; he couldn’t understand a word. Not for the first time in his life, he felt totally alone. A suburb of Ankara may have been a safe haven but it was no place to hang around for long. He got up, scraped his stool under the table, left the grainy coffee and the half-eaten egg and wandered out into the noise and smells of Turkey.

The abiding impression was one of peace and quiet. They weren’t laughing and joking, or shouting and dancing around. Most had expressions on their faces that reflected the gravity of the occasion; many held their heads down as if to avoid the intrinsic joy of the sunny day. City officials, working overtime on this stressful Saturday, looked out of their windows and at the rapidly emerging TV images and felt a sinking feeling in their stomachs. This was one of those moments in history, where irrespective of how they were being influenced by others, the people were determined to demonstrate their will and it was a gathering force that couldn’t be stopped.

Wil rubbed his cheeks furiously but no matter how he tried the white make-up had left a ghostly shadow on his face.
“You look like shit! I told you didn’t I; it’s not the fucking Carnival!”
Ruud had completely lost patience with his partner. They’d rowed more or less continually since they’d been woken at four in the morning by ‘I am what I am’ belting out from Wil’s new clock radio.
Crestfallen, Wil turned his tear-stained face away from the mirror and mumbled miserably.
“I know, I know, it was a mistake alright! I can’t get it all off.”
“Trust you! Ever the drama queen! Can’t you just for once let the attention focus on something else apart from yourself? God, you look like bloody Pagliacci!”
Ruud didn’t mean to be harsh, he just couldn’t help himself. He was tired, desperately tired. It had been a hellish week rushing around from one person to the other, trying to establish truth in the fog of half truths and rumours that was enveloping the city at the moment. The discovery of a possible reason for all the secrecy only increased the tension and he half wished someone else had found it out and not them. There was still no trace of Jacco and it was him they were going to remember on the Dam that morning. The pains in his chest and the constant headaches reminded him that he wasn’t getting any younger and that all this wasn’t good for his health but then again, who wasn’t under stress in Amsterdam at the moment!
Still in his underwear, Wil got up and put his arms around Ruud, laid his head on his shoulder and kissed him gently on the neck.
“I’m sorry, you’re right, I am a selfish cow. I wanted to look right and forgot what today is all about. We’ve had another hard week but we shouldn’t take it out on each other should we? Now let’s see, you’ve got two pairs of white jeans; I’ll use one of them and just roll the legs up. We’ve got white trainers and white shirts. I don’t think t-shirts are smart enough do you. I’ve got a white bow tie and you can use the white scarf. If we get a move on, we can be ready in half an hour. I love you by the way.”
It might have seemed a throw-away line but Ruud knew that he meant it and his own frustration and anger dissipated as he watched Wil move into action mode. They left the apartment hand in hand and waved happily to the group of Moroccan teenagers clustered on the corner. Today, even they waved back.

Although the Anvil was still cordoned off, many hundreds headed to the site to lay flowers along the edge of the red and white tape and yet more bouquets, wreaths and even single flowers donated by children were piling up in an ever-increasing circle around the National Monument. The phallic symbolism was lost on nobody.
A podium also draped in white but now festooned with Dutch and rainbow flags had been erected to one side of the monument and it was from there, at precisely ten o’clock that Rick Theunissen called for a minute’s silence to honour the dead.
The Amsterdam Series Home
43. Revelations on TV

44. A city mourns
daverich1033008.jpg daverich1033007.jpg